We put the Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra through our rigorous suite of SBMARK Camera tests to measure its performance in terms of photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article takes a closer look at how the device fared across a range of tests and several common use cases, and aims to highlight the most important results from our tests with an excerpt of the captured data.

Overview

Camera Key Specifications:

  • Primary: 50MP 1/1.56″ sensor, 1.0µm pixels, 24mm equivalent f/1.9 aperture lens, PDAF, OIS gimbal
  • Ultra Wide Angle: 13MP 1/3.0″ sensor, 1.12µm pixels, 13mm f/2.2 equivalent aperture lens
  • Tele: 32 MP 1/3.2″ sensor, 0.7 µm pixels, 65 mm equivalent f/2.4 aperture lens, PDAF, OIS

Pros

  • Good exposure for landscape shots in daylight
  • Fairly accurate white balance in daylight and indoors
  • Image noise fairly well under control in bright light conditions
  • Precise autofocus
  • Good exposure and white balance, low noise in bright light videos
  • Video stabilization effective in most cases

Against

  • Skin tone rendering occasionally inaccurate
  • Local noise often seen in indoor and low-light scenes
  • Lack of consistency in low light conditions
  • Lack of detail in most zoom shots
  • Exposure, color, and autofocus instability in videos
  • Limited dynamic range
  • Low levels of video detail
  • Inaccurate color rendering and lack of saturation in video

The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra is capable of taking decent photos and video clips in everyday use, but it failed to match the best Ultra Premium rivals in the SBMARK Camera tests, earning lower scores pretty much across the board. Exposure was good when taking landscape shots, and our testers liked the reasonably accurate white balance and low noise levels in bright light. However, they also noted inaccurate skin tones, as well as noise and a lack of detail in low light. Zoomed shots lacked detail and could be noisy at most focal length settings, and while video clips were steady and smooth in most scenarios, video detail was low and exposure, color, and autofocus were all choppy in some conditions.

Test summary

About SBMARK Camera Tests: SBMARK camera ratings are conducted in laboratories and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. Scores are based on objective tests where results are calculated directly from measurement software on our laboratory setups, and perceptual tests where a sophisticated set of parameters allows a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. A smartphone test involves a team of engineers and technicians for approximately one week. Photo, zoom and video quality are evaluated separately and then combined into an overall score for comparing cameras in different devices. For more information on the SBMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores can be found here. The following section summarizes key elements of SBMARK’s comprehensive testing and analysis. Full performance ratings are available upon request. Contact us to learn how to receive a full report.

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra vs Ultra-Premium Camera Scores

This chart compares SBMARK scores for photo, zoom and video between the tested device and the references. The average and maximum scores for the price segment are also shown. The average and maximum scores for each price segment are calculated based on the SBMARK database of tested devices.

Photo

131

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

About SBMARK Camera Photo Tests

For evaluation and analysis, SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images in both controlled laboratory environments and natural outdoor, indoor and low-light scenes, using default camera settings. The photographic protocol is designed to account for key use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portrait, family and landscape photography. Evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and performing objective measurements on chart images captured in the laboratory under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

In Photo mode, the Zenfone 11 Ultra was able to capture pleasing images in most test conditions, even in difficult backlit scenes or when shooting in low-light conditions. However, overall photography performance remained below the best competitors in its price segment. Our testers occasionally found the subject to be slightly underexposed and the skin tone to be slightly off. While the trade-off between detail preservation and noise reduction was quite good in bright light, the level of detail captured failed to match the best devices in the category. Image noise levels increased in typical indoor lighting and in low-light conditions. Our testers also observed some noise in the shadows. In terms of image artifacts, ghosting could often be seen on moving subjects.

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Photo vs Ultra-Premium Scores

Photographic tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise under various lighting conditions. Autofocus performance and artifacts are also evaluated on all images captured under controlled laboratory conditions and in real-world images. All of these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of images captured with the tested device and can help to understand the main strengths and weaknesses of the camera.

Exposure

107

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Color

110

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Exposure and color are the key attributes for technically good images. For exposure, the primary attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject across various use cases such as landscape, portrait, or still life. Other factors evaluated are contrast and dynamic range, such as the ability to render details in both the bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera’s ability to provide the same rendering when taking multiple images of the same scene.
For color, the image quality attributes analyzed are skin tone rendition, white balance, color hue, and repeatability. For color and skin tone rendition, we penalize unnatural colors but respect the manufacturer’s choice of color signature.

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra – Slight underexposure on face, inaccurate skin tones, especially dark skin tones

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Good exposure and skin tone rendition

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Good exposure and skin tone rendition

Auto focus

103

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Autofocus tests focus on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shutter lag, and depth of field. Shutter lag is the difference between when the user presses the capture button and when the image is actually taken. It includes the speed of focusing and the ability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called “zero shutter lag” capability. While a shallow depth of field can be nice for a single subject portrait or a close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; both are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all real-world images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low-light conditions to outdoors.

Autofocus speed and irregularity: 20Lux Δ7EV Portable Tungsten

This graph illustrates the accuracy and speed of the focus as well as the zero shutter lag capability by showing the edge sharpness versus shutter speed measured on the AFHDR setup over a series of images. All images were shot at 20 Lux with tungsten illuminant, 500 ms after blurring. In this scenario, the backlit panels in the scene are set to simulate a fairly high dynamic range: the luminance ratio between the brightest point and an 18% reflective gray patch is 7, which we denote by an exposure value difference of 7. The edge sharpness is measured on the four edges of the Dead Leaves graph and the shutter speed is measured on the Universal Timer LED.

Structure

100

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of subjects in images shot in the lab and in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, special attention is paid to the level of detail in the bright and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary SBMARK (DMC) chart and the Dead Leaves chart.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) Detail Retention Score vs. Lux Levels for Tripod and Handheld Conditions

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Retention Score with lux level, for two holding conditions. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and detail rendering on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.

Noise

89

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure on real images and chart images taken in the laboratory. For natural images, special attention is paid to noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The chart used is the Dead Leaves chart and the measurement standardized as Visual Noise derived from ISO 15739.

Evolution of visual noise with illuminance levels in portable conditions

This graph shows the evolution of the visual noise metric with lux level in handheld conditions. The visual noise metric is the average of the visual noise measurement across all Dead Leaves plot patches in the AFHDR configuration. The SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Artifacts

75

Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G

Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G

Artifact grading examines lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometric distortion, edge ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color shifts, among other types of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the higher the points deducted from the score. The main artifacts observed and the corresponding loss of points are listed below.

Penalty for main photo artifacts

Blurry

70

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Bokeh is tested in a dedicated mode, usually portrait mode or aperture, and analyzed by visually inspecting all images captured in the lab and in natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce a portrait photograph comparable to that taken with a DLSR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes that are paid attention to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the shape of the bokeh blur reflectors. Portrait image quality attributes (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into account.

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra – Depth estimation artifacts in all test conditions, inaccurate depth segmentation

Preview

68

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max

Preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app’s image preview, with a focus on the difference between capture and preview, particularly with respect to dynamic range and the application of bokeh. The smoothness of exposure, color, and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimum to the maximum zoom factor available is also evaluated. Preview frame rate is measured using the LED Universal Timer.

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra – Preview – Bokeh effect much less pronounced than the final capture

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra – Capture

Enlarge

107

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

About SBMARK Camera Zoom Tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled laboratory environments and in natural outdoor, indoor and low-light scenes, using camera presets and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra-wide to ultra-long range zoom. Evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and by performing objective measurements of lab-captured chart images under various conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.

The Zenfone 11 Ultra’s 3x telephoto optical zoom delivered decent image results when shooting in bright light, but it lost quality at close and long range. In more challenging conditions, such as low light, noise could be quite intrusive and images could lack detail. Additionally, our testers observed some exposure errors, resulting in underexposed images. The ultra-wide-angle camera performed well in bright light, but showed limitations indoors and in low light. Skin tones often looked unnatural, and white balance casts could be noticeable.

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Zoom vs Ultra-Premium Scores

This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The x-axis is expressed in 35mm equivalent focal length. Zoom in scores are displayed on the right and zoom out scores on the left.

Wide

57

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA

These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide-angle camera at different focal lengths from 12mm to 20mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention to artifacts such as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. The images below are an excerpt of tested scenes.

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra – Accurate Target Exposure, Low Contrast, and Dull Colors

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Accurate target exposure, nice contrasts and colors

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Precise target exposure, pleasant contrasts and colors

TV

ninety two

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 40mm to 300mm, with particular attention to texture and detail. The score is derived from a series of objective laboratory measurements and perceptual analysis of real images.

SBMARK (DMC) Detail Retention Score by Focal Length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum score of the detail preservation metric: a higher value indicates better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.

SBMARK (DMC) Detail Retention Score by Focal Length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum score of the detail preservation metric: a higher value indicates better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.

SBMARK (DMC) Detail Retention Score by Focal Length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum score of the detail preservation metric: a higher value indicates better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.

SBMARK (DMC) Detail Retention Score by Focal Length

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum score of the detail preservation metric: a higher value indicates better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.

video

115

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

About SBMARK Camera Video Tests

SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled laboratory environments and natural low-light scenes, indoors and outdoors, using the camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural video captured under various conditions and performing objective measurements on lab-recorded chart videos under various conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.

Overall, the Zenfone 11 Ultra’s video mode left a lot of room for improvement. The camera often botched exposures when recording in bright or indoor conditions. While the white balance was neutral, there were some issues with exposure and color transitions. The autofocus generally did a good job of keeping the subject in focus, but it was choppy with some stepping. Video noise levels were low, but so was the level of detail recorded. While video stabilization was generally good enough at countering camera shake, there was some camera shake in more challenging scenes.

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra vs Ultra-Premium Video Scores

Video tests analyze the same image quality attributes as still images, such as exposure, color, texture, or noise, as well as temporal aspects such as speed, smoothness, and stability of exposure, white balance, and autofocus transitions.

Exposure

99

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Color

84

Honor Magic6 Pro

Honor Magic6 Pro

Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, i.e. the ability to make details visible in both the bright and dark areas of the image. Exposure stability and temporal adaptation are also analyzed.
Image quality color analysis examines color rendition, skin tone rendition, white balance, color hue, white balance stability and its adaptation to changing light.

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra – Good exposure but highlight clipping

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Good exposure, very wide dynamic range

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Good exposure, very wide dynamic range

In most conditions, some adjustment issues with exposure and white balance are noticeable, but especially indoors and in low light.

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra – Smooth Exposure Transition

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Smooth Exposure Transition

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Smooth Exposure Transition

Structure

106

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of real videos and laboratory-recorded graphic videos. Natural video recordings are evaluated visually, with particular attention to the level of detail in bright and dark areas. Objective measurements are performed on graphic images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The graphs used are the SBMARK (DMC) graph and the Dead Leaves graph.

SBMARK CHART (DMC) Video Detail Retention Score vs. Lux Levels

This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Preservation video score with the level of lux in the video. The DMC Detail Preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate the rendering of texture and detail on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.

Noise

87

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real video recordings and lab-shot chart videos. Natural videos are evaluated visually, with special attention to noise in dark areas and under high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on chart videos recorded under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the SBMARK Visual Noise Chart.

Evolution of spatial visual noise with the illuminance level

This graph shows the evolution of spatial visual noise with lux level. Spatial visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise configuration. The SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.

Temporal evolution of visual noise with the level of illumination

This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with lux level. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise configuration.

Stabilization

107

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro

Stabilization rating tests the device’s ability to stabilize footage using software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any other means. The rating looks at residual motion, smoothness, yellow artifacts, and residual motion blur in walking and running usage cases under various lighting conditions. The video below is an excerpt from one of the scenes tested.

Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra – Good stabilization, slight camera shake noticeable

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – Great stabilization

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra – Excellent stabilization

Artifacts

81

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Xiaomi 12S Ultra

Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart in the lab, as well as frame rate measurements using the LED Universal Timer. Natural videos are evaluated visually with special attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the higher the points deducted from the score. The main artifacts and the corresponding point loss are listed below.

Penalty for major video artifacts

Let's talk about "Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Camera Test" with our community!
Start a new Thread

Philip Owell

Professional blogger, here to bring you new and interesting content every time you visit our blog.