We put the Motorola edge – 2025 through our rigorous DXOMark battery test suite to measure its performance independently, charge and efficiency. In these test results, we will break down the way it went to a variety of tests and several cases of common use.
Panoramic
Key specifications:
- Battery capacity: 5200 mAh
- 68 W charger (not included)
- 6.7 inches, 1220 x 2712, 120 Hz, OLED display
- MediaTek EXCIALE 7400 (4 Nm)
- Rom combination / tested ram: 256 GB + 8 GB
Pros
- Good autonomy for most use cases, offering 72 hours of battery life with a single charge
- Strong power optimization with low exhaust currents for most use cases
Against
- Energy efficiency of charging under the average
- Obvious delay between the indicator that shows 100% and the actual completion of the charging for the wired and wireless methods
The Motorola Edge 2025 has secured a point in the top 10 of our ranking for battery performance, offering well balanced results on all test criteria.
It offers an impressive overall autonomy, allowing users to enjoy more than three days of use with a single charge in moderate conditions (with an average of four hours of active / day use). The device works strongly in most use cases and is particularly suitable for extensive video streaming and game sessions.
On the charging front, the device includes a 68 W charger and has reached a complete charge in just over an hour. Wireless charging, a noteworthy feature at this price, took more than two hours to completely recharge the battery. It is worth noting that, regardless of the recharging method, the user interface indicates 100% before the battery is actually loaded, which occurs about 10 minutes later. For those who need a quick push, a 5-minute wired top-up provided up to 8 hours of additional autonomy.
As for the charging efficiency, the Motorola Edge 2025 showed results below average, largely due to a less effective charger. However, in terms of energy consumption, he excellent in most of the tested scenarios, highlighting a strong optimization of the power and a system efficiently designed.
Test summary
Dxomark battery test information: For the score and analysis in our smartphone batteries reviews, DXOMark engineers perform a variety of objective tests for a period of a week both inside and outside. (See our introduction and how to test articles for more details on our battery protocol for smartphones.)
The following section collects key elements of our tests and exhaustive analysis performed in the DXOMark workshops. Detailed assessments of services in the form of reports are available on request. Do not hesitate to contact us.
| Drums | Charger | Wireless | Display | Processor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motorola Edge 60 Pro | 6000 mah | 90 W. (not included) |
15 W. | poled 1220 x 2712 |
MediaTek EXISTE 8350 |
| Honor Magic7 Lite | 6600 mah | 66W (included) |
– | AMOLED 1224 x 2700 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Jan 1 |
| Oppo Find X8 | 5630 mah | 80W (included) |
50 W. | AMOLED 1256 x 2760 |
MediaTek Dimensy 9400 |
Autonomy
162
Honor Magic7 Lite
Honor Magic7 Lite
How the autonomy score is composed
The autonomy score is made up of three sub-punteggi: home / office, traveling and calibrated use cases. Each sub-small includes the results of a complete range of tests to measure autonomy in all types of real life scenarios.
103h
Light use
Active: 2h30/day
72h
Moderate use
Active: 4h/day
44h
Intense use
Active: 7h/day
Home/Office
A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a series of touch-based user actions during what we call our “typical use scenario” (TUS)-to make calls, streaming video, etc.-4 hours of active use during a period of 16 hours, plus 8 hours of “sleep”. The robot repeats this set of actions every day until the device is exhausted.
Traveling
151
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
The use of a moving smartphone has an impact on autonomy due to further “hidden” requests, such as the continuous report associated with the selection of the mobile network, for example. Dxomark battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a set of activity defined with precision while following the same three -hour travel itinerary (walk, take the bus, the subway …) for each device
Calibrated
161
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
For this series of tests, the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and ours Robots repeatedly perform actions connected to a specific case of specific use (such as games, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from a 80% charge, all devices are tested until they spent at least 5% of the battery power.
Charge Up
142
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
How the charging score is composed
Charging is part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where autonomy is at a minimum, knowing how quickly you can load it becomes a concern. The DXOMark battery charging score is made up of two secondary scores, (1) Complete charge and (2) Quick increase.
Full charge
123
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Complete charge tests evaluate the reliability of the battery power indicator; Measure how long and how much power it takes the battery to load from zero to 80%, from 80 to 100% as shown by the user interface and up to an effective full charge.
The charging curves, in wiring and wireless (if available) that show the evolution of the battery level indicator and the consumption of energy in Watts during the charging phases towards full capacity.
The charging curves, in wiring and wireless (if available) that show the evolution of the battery level indicator and the consumption of energy in Watts during the charging phases towards full capacity.
Rapid thrust
164
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), the quick increase tests measure the amount of charge that the battery receives after being connected for 5 minutes. The graph here compares the average gain of autonomy from a quick charge of 5 minutes.
Efficiency
143
Oppo Reno6 5G
Oppo Reno6 5G
How the efficiency score is composed
The DXOMark energy efficiency score consists of two sub-small, charge and discharge rate, both of which combine the data obtained during the typical use scenario based on robots, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into consideration the battery capacity of the device. Dxomark calculates the annual energy consumption of the product, shown on the graph below, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.
Charge Up
117
Nubia redmagic 7 pro
Nubia redmagic 7 pro
The load sub-paying is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a complete charge, relating to how much energy it is necessary to fill the battery with respect to the energy that the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring energy from an outlet to the phone; residual consumption when the phone is completely loaded and in any case connected to the charger; And the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected. The following graphic descent shows the overall efficiency of a complete charge in %.
Discharge
158
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
The exhaust subscription evaluates the exhaust speed of a battery during a test, regardless of the battery capacity. It is the relationship between the ability of a battery divided by its autonomy. A small capacity battery could have the same autonomy as a large capacity battery, indicating that the device is well optimized, with a low download speed.
Start a new Thread