We subjected the Oppo Reno12 Pro to our rigorous SBMARK Battery test suite to measure its performance in terms of battery life, charging and efficiency. In the results of these tests, we will analyze how it performed in a series of tests and in several common use cases.
Overview
Key Specifications:
- Battery capacity: 5000mAh
- 80W charger (included)
- 6.7 inch OLED display, 1080 x 2412, 120 Hz
- MediaTek Dimensity 7300-Energy
- Tested ROM/RAM combination: 512GB + 12GB
Pros
- Excellent internal autonomy
- Low discharge currents in all use cases
- More than 7 hours of battery life recovered with a 5 minute boosted charge
Against
- Below average overall charging efficiency
- High residual power consumption from the adapter while the device is still connected
- Below average battery life when calling outdoors
The excellent battery result of the Oppo Reno12 Pro was supported by its balanced and excellent performance in terms of autonomy, charging and efficiency, which demonstrated that the device’s power system was well optimized.
In autonomy, the Oppo Reno12 Pro lasted almost 71 hours of moderate use. Tests showed that power loss was only 1% overnight while the phone was idle. In most use cases, the battery life of the device was generally above average, with the exception of listening to music. However, the device proved to be just average in on-the-go tests, especially during calls. Call time dropped to less than 22 hours in outdoor conditions from more than 35 hours in indoor tests.
The Oppo Reno12 Pro features a 5000mAh battery and comes with an 80W charger that allows the device to reach a full charge in just over an hour. Thanks to the powerful charger, the Reno12 Pro regained more than seven hours of battery life with a 5-minute boost charge.
The Oppo Reno12 Pro’s efficiency score was above average overall, held back by charging efficiency despite better discharging efficiency. The overall charging efficiency of the device was 73.2%, which indicates that more than a quarter of the energy was wasted during the charging process. However, lower than average discharge currents mean that the device manages its power very efficiently.
Compared to other devices in the high-end segment ($400-$599), Oppo Reno12 Pro ranked first, thanks to its excellent and balanced battery performance.
Test summary
Information on SBMARK battery tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone battery reviews, SBMARK engineers perform a series of objective tests over a period of one week both indoors and outdoors. (See our introduction and how we test articles for more details on our smartphone battery protocol.)
The following section brings together key elements of our comprehensive testing and analysis performed in SBMARK laboratories. Detailed performance evaluations in the form of reports are available upon request. Do not hesitate to contact us.
| Drums | Battery charger | wireless | Screen | Processor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OppoReno12Pro | 5000mAh | 80W (included) |
– | AMOLED 1080 x 2412 |
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 – Energy |
| Xiaomi14 | 4610mAh | 90W (not included) |
50W | AMOLED 1200 x 2670 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Realme GT Neo 5 (240W) | 4600mAh | 240W (included) |
– | OLED 1240 x 2772 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
How the autonomy score is composed
The battery life score is made up of three performance subscores: Home/Office, On the Go, and Calibrated Use Cases. Each subscore includes the results of a full range of tests to measure battery life in all types of real-life scenarios.
101 hours
Light usage
Active: 2h30/day
71h
Moderate use
Active: 4 hours a day
44 hours
Intense use
Active: 7 hours a day
Home office
A robot housed in a Faraday cage performs a series of touch-based user actions during what we call our “Typical Usage Scenario” (TUS) (making calls, streaming video, etc.) – 4 hours of active use over the course of 16 hours. -a period of one hour, plus 8 hours of “sleep”. The robot repeats this series of actions every day until the device runs out of power.
In movement
129
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
Using a smartphone on the move puts a strain on battery life due to additional “hidden” needs, such as the continuous signaling associated with cellular network selection. SBMARK Battery experts take the phone outdoors and perform a series of well-defined activities following the same three-hour travel itinerary (walking, taking the bus, subway…) for each device
Calibrated
139
Samsung Galaxy M51
Samsung Galaxy M51
For this series of tests the smartphone returns to the Faraday cage and our bots repeatedly perform actions related to a specific use case (such as gaming, video streaming, etc.) at a time. Starting from an 80% charge, all devices are tested until they have consumed at least 5% of their battery charge.
In charge
139
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
How the charging score is made up
Charging is a full part of the overall battery experience. In some situations where battery life is at its lowest, knowing how fast you can charge becomes a concern. The SBMARK Battery Charging Score is made up of two sub-scores, (1) Full Charge and (2) Quick Boost.
Full charge
127
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Full charge tests evaluate the reliability of the battery charge indicator; measure how long and how much energy the battery takes to charge from zero to 80% capacity, from 80 to 100% as shown by the user interface, and until actually fully charged.
The charging curves, in wired and wireless mode (if available) show the evolution of the battery level indicator as well as the energy consumption in watts during the charging phases towards full capacity.
The time to full charge table breaks down the time needed to reach 80%, 100%, and full charge.
Quick push
153
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
Realme GT Neo 5 (240W)
With the phone at different charge levels (20%, 40%, 60%, 80%), the Quick Boost tests measure how much charge the battery receives after being plugged in for 5 minutes. The graph here compares the average battery life gain with a 5 minute fast charge.
Efficiency
135
Oppo Reno6 5G
Oppo Reno6 5G
How the efficiency score is composed
The SBMARK Energy Efficiency Score is composed of two sub-scores, charging speed and discharging speed, which combine both data obtained during a typical robot-based usage scenario, calibrated tests and charging evaluation, taking into account battery capacity of the device. SBMARK calculates the annual energy consumption of the product, shown in the graph below, which is representative of the overall efficiency during a charge and when in use.
Charge Up
107
Nubia Red Magic 7 Pro
Nubia Red Magic 7 Pro
The charging subscore is a combination of four factors: the overall efficiency of a full charge, related to the amount of energy needed to fill the battery compared to the energy the battery can provide; the efficiency of the travel adapter when it comes to transferring power from an outlet to your phone; the residual consumption when the phone is fully charged and still connected to the charger; and the residual consumption of the charger itself, when the smartphone is disconnected from it. The graph below shows the overall efficiency of a full charge in %.
Discharge
151
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
The discharge subscore evaluates how quickly a battery discharges during a test, which is independent of the battery’s capacity. It is the ratio between the capacity of a battery divided by its autonomy. A small capacity battery may have the same battery life as a large capacity battery, indicating that the device is well optimized, with a low discharge rate.
Start a new Thread