We put the Xiaomi 14T Pro through our rigorous SBMARK camera test suite to measure its performance in terms of photo, video and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article analyzes the behavior of the device in a series of tests and several common use cases and aims to highlight the most important results of our tests with an excerpt of the acquired data.
Overview
Key Camera Specifications:
- Primary: 50 MP sensor, 1/1.31″, 4-in-1 Super Pixel, 2.4 µm pixels, 23 mm equivalent f/1.6 aperture lens, OIS
- Ultra-wide: 12MP, f/2.2, 15mm equivalent, 120° field of view
- Tele: 50MP, f/2.0, 60mm equivalent
Pro
- Mostly good exposure when contrasts are not too strong
- Wide depth of field
- Nice rendition of skin tone in bright light photos
- Good exposure and wide dynamic range in video mode
- Stable and smooth video autofocus
- Effective video stabilization
Against
- Limited dynamic range, especially noticeable in high-contrast scenes
- Some loss of detail when shooting indoors or in low light conditions, both for photos and videos
- Instability of exposure and white balance between consecutive shots and in videos
- Noise in photos and videos indoors and in low light
- Desaturated colors, especially in broad daylight
- Exposure and color instability in bokeh mode
The Xiaomi 14T Pro performed well in the SBMARK Camera tests, securing its place among the best in the device ranking for the Premium segment. Overall, the quality of still images and videos was quite decent and quite similar to that of the Xiaomi 14. In our tests, the camera performed well when shooting landscape and portrait images outdoors, but there was a noticeable lack of details in images in low light conditions.
The ultra-wide images arrived with good exposure and nice colors when shooting in bright light or indoors. However, our testers noted a lack of detail and some unwanted image artifacts, including color fringing, anamorphosis, and edge softness. Telezoom quality was decent at close and medium ranges, but images lacked detail. At longer tele settings, with the dedicated tele module taking full control, images deliver wide dynamic range, accurate exposure and pleasing colors.
In video mode, exposure was good and our sample clips showed good detail in highlights and shadows. Additionally, both the autofocus and stabilization systems worked well. However, colors may appear desaturated and we noticed a lack of detail. Exposure matching problems may also occur.
Please note that for this review, videos from the device were captured and analyzed in HDR mode. You’ll need an HDR-compatible screen to view the HDR exposure and color rendition of videos on the YouTube player.
Test summary
About SBMARK Camera Tests: SBMARK camera evaluations take place in laboratories and real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. Scores are based on objective tests whose results are calculated directly by measurement software in our laboratory setups, and on perceptual tests where a sophisticated set of metrics allows a panel of imaging experts to compare aspects of image quality images that require human judgment. Testing a smartphone involves a team of engineers and technicians for about a week. Photo, zoom and video quality are evaluated separately and then combined into an overall score for comparing cameras on different devices. For more information on the SBMARK camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores can be found here. The following section compiles key elements of SBMARK’s comprehensive testing and analysis. Full performance evaluations are available upon request. Please contact us to find out how to receive a full report.
Xiaomi 14T Pro camera scores
This graph compares SBMARK photo, zoom, and video scores between the tested device and the references. The average and maximum scores of the price range are also indicated. The average and maximum scores for each price segment are calculated based on the SBMARK database of tested devices.
Photo
129
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
About SBMARK Camera Photo Tests
For scoring and analysis, SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images in both controlled laboratory environments and natural outdoor, indoor, and low-light scenes, using the camera’s default settings. The photography protocol is designed to take into account key use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portrait, family and landscape photography. Evaluation is performed by visually examining images Cons a natural scene reference and performing objective measurements on laboratory-captured graph images under varying lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.
In our photography tests, the Xiaomi 14T Pro performed well overall, achieving slightly better results than the Xiaomi 14. Exposure was mostly good, as long as there wasn’t too much contrast in the scene. In high-contrast scenes, the lack of dynamic range may result in highlights being clipped. Our testers also observed some exposure instability in a series of consecutive shots. The camera produced pleasing skin tones in bright light, but color casts were noticeable when shooting in low light, and white balance could be unstable.
The autofocus system worked accurately, and a wide depth of field allowed for good sharpness across multiple subject planes. The level of detail in the Xiaomi’s still images was quite high but we noticed a loss of detail in most testing conditions. The 14T Pro was overall slightly worse than the Xiaomi 14 in this respect. Ghosting and blending artifacts may be evident when capturing high-contrast scenes, as well as tonal shift around cropped areas.
Xiaomi 14T Pro Photo scores compared to Premium
Exposure
107
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Color
110
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Exposure and color are the key attributes for technically good images. For exposure, the main attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject across various use cases such as landscape, portrait or still life. Other factors evaluated are contrast and dynamic range, e.g. the ability to make details visible in both bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera’s ability to provide the same rendering when shooting multiple images of the same scene.
Regarding color, the image quality attributes analyzed are skin tone rendering, white balance, color shading and repeatability. Regarding color and skin tone rendering, we penalize unnatural colors but respect the manufacturer’s choice of color signature.


Motorola Edge 50 Neo – Good exposure and natural skin tones
Auto focus
100
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Autofocus tests focus on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shutter lag, and depth of field. Shutter delay is the difference between when the user presses the capture button and when the image is actually taken. It includes focusing speed and the device’s ability to capture images at the right time, the so-called “zero shutter lag” capability. While a shallow depth of field can be nice for a single-subject portrait or close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; Both situations are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all real-world images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and low-light conditions to outdoor conditions.
Irregularity of edge sharpness and average shot delay under all tested conditions
Autofocus irregularity and speed: 1000Lux Δ0EV portable daylight
Structure
105
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of subjects in images taken in the laboratory and in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, special attention is paid to the level of detail in the light and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on map images taken under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The papers used are the proprietary SBMARK (DMC) paper and the Dead Leaves paper.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) Detail Retention Score vs. Lux Levels for Tripod and Handheld Conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score with lux level, for two retention conditions. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate the performance of texture and detail on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.
Noise
107
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain and texture on real images and on graphics images taken in the laboratory. For natural images, particular attention is paid to noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on graph images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The graph used is the dead leaf graph and standardized measurement such as visual noise derived from ISO 15739.
Evolution of visual noise with illuminance levels under handheld conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the visual noise metric with lux level in handheld conditions. The visual noise metric is the average of the visual noise measurement across all areas of the Dead Leaves graph in the AFHDR configuration. SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.
Artifacts
61
XiaomiRedmi 12 5G
XiaomiRedmi 12 5G
Artifact evaluation examines lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometric distortion, ringing edges, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color tone changes, among other types of possible unnatural effects on the photos. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the greater the point deduction from the score. The main artifacts observed and the corresponding point loss are listed below.
Major penalties for photography artifacts
Preview
67
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Preview tests analyze the quality of the camera app’s image preview, with a focus on the difference between capture and preview, particularly regarding dynamic range and the application of bokeh. The smoothness of exposure, color and focus adaptation when switching from the minimum to the maximum available zoom factor is also evaluated. The preview frame rate is measured using the LED universal timer.

Xiaomi 14T Pro – Preview – Similar to capture, even in HDR conditions

Xiaomi 14T Pro – Capture
Zoom
144
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Learn about SBMARK camera zoom tests
SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 400 test images in controlled laboratory environments and in natural scenes outdoors, indoors, and in low-light conditions, using default camera settings and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra wide zoom to long range zoom. The evaluation is performed by visually examining the images Cons a reference of natural scenes and performing objective measurements of map images captured in the laboratory under different conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.
When using the ultra-wide camera or tele-zoom, the 14T Pro provided very similar, but slightly better results than the Xiaomi 14. Target exposure was accurate, with nice colors in bright light and when shooting indoors . On some occasions you may notice a slightly warm but pleasant nuance. The camera’s performance was quite stable in consecutive shots. However, the level of detail captured may be low and artefacts such as color fringing, anamorphosis and edge softness may be evident.
When telezooming, the camera provided decent quality at close- and medium-range settings, albeit with a lack of detail. After switching to the dedicated tele module, image quality was quite acceptable, with a wide dynamic range, accurate exposure, and nice colors. However, it couldn’t quite match the Xiaomi 14 Ultra.
Xiaomi 14T Pro Zoom scores compared to Premium
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The abscissa is expressed in focal length equivalent to 35 mm. Zoomed scores appear on the right and zoomed scores appear on the left.
Wide
101
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide camera at different focal lengths from 12mm to 20mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention to artifacts such as chromatic aberrations, lens softness and distortion. The images below are an excerpt of the tested scenes.

Xiaomi 14T Pro – Good exposure, nice colors and warm white balance

Xiaomi 14T – Good exposure, nice colors and warm white balance, very similar to the 14T Pro

Xiaomi 14 – Good exposure, nice colors and neutral white balance
Tele
107
Xiaomi 14Ultra
Xiaomi 14Ultra
All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths between approximately 40mm and 300mm, with particular attention to texture and detail. The score is derived from a series of objective measurements in the laboratory and perceptual analysis of real-life images.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length
SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) detail retention score by focal length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance, and the y-axis represents the maximum detail retention metric score – a higher value means better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application user interface.
Video
138
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
About SBMARK Camera Video Tests
SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled laboratory environments and natural low-light scenes, indoors and outdoors, using default camera settings. The evaluation consists of visual inspection of natural videos taken under various conditions and performing objective measurements on videos of graphs recorded in the laboratory under different conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300 K to 6,500 K.
In video mode, our testers observed some improvements over previous models, especially when using HDR mode. Exposure was mostly accurate, with a wide dynamic range. However, exposure matching problems may sometimes be evident. Colors were often desaturated when recording in daylight conditions, and color casts were evident in low-light conditions. Autofocus was stable and smooth under most test conditions. The level of recorded textures was quite high overall but a loss of detail was evident. Video noise was well managed in bright conditions, but could be a little intrusive in low-light clips. The stabilization system worked effectively while standing still or moving during recording, but the difference in sharpness between individual video frames could be noticeable.
Xiaomi 14T Pro Video scores compared to Premium
Exposure
105
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Color
92
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, e.g. the ability to make details visible in both bright and dark areas of the image. The stability and temporal adaptation of the exposure are also analyzed.
Image quality color analysis examines color rendering, skin tone rendering, white balance, color shading, white balance stability and its adaptation when the light changes.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo – Slight underexposure at the end, slightly strong contrast, nice colors, slight auto-refocus, good details
Structure
109
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of real videos and graphics videos recorded in the laboratory. Natural video footage is assessed visually, paying particular attention to the level of detail in bright and dark areas. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The cards used are SBMARK (DMC) card and Dead Leaves card.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) Video detail retention score versus lux levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail retention video score with the lux level in the video. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate the performance of texture and detail on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.
Noise
109
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real video recordings and on videos of graphs taken in the laboratory. Natural videos are evaluated visually, with particular attention to noise in dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on graph videos recorded under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The graph used is the SBMARK visual noise graph.
Evolution of spatial visual noise with illuminance level
Temporal evolution of visual noise with illuminance level
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with lux level. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise setup.
Stabilization
112
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
The stabilization rating checks the device’s ability to stabilize footage thanks to software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS or any other means. The evaluation examines residual motion, smoothness, yellow artifacts, and residual motion blur in walking and running use cases under various lighting conditions. The video below is an excerpt of one of the scenes tested.
Xiaomi 14T Pro – Good stabilization but occasional differences in sharpness between frames
Xiaomi 14 – Good stabilization
Motorola Edge 40 Neo – Camera shake when walking while recording
Artifacts
81
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR graph in the lab, as well as frame rate measurements using the LED universal timer. Natural videos are visually evaluated paying particular attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the greater the deduction of points from the score. The main artifacts and the corresponding point loss are listed below.
Top penalties for video artifacts

Start a new Thread