No, wait, let’s understand each other. If evidence blooms on the sidelines of a piece of news, at least a clue, which compromises its credibility, then it is legitimate to scrutinize it even thoroughly. Possibly with the intention of re-establishing the truth denied by the false news, rather than with that of contesting the falsity of the news: which are profoundly different and very differently oriented attitudes (one fears the truth of the news, the other fears that is widespread).

And so, if the news is about a massacre, it is perfectly fine to investigate when there is a signal that it can be invented. But another thing is what happened with the Bucha massacre, and first with the bombed hospital, and first with the rapes and down to the beginning of the Russian aggression, all events with respect to which much of the ‘information – not only the most joyfully embedded in Kremlin – has been prepared not to report on it, but to suspect its likelihood: and, precisely, in the absence of any serious element that denounces the danger of fakes.

Unless we believe that the Russian agency that the hospital was a hideout of Nazis in disguise, or the video that reveals the resurrection of the dead on the streets after the passage of the Ukrainian camera that stages the theory of murdered with their hands tied behind their backs.

Passed off as due caution and professional precision, this is the mechanical reaction that is widespread among the bulk of the information (I repeat, not only in the ranks of the most brazen TV-garbage in the velinismo of “special operations”): and that is to give the news by “processing it “, Now openly contesting the basis, now insinuating that, who knows, you go to know, because it is known that in war the first victim is the truth.

And if even nothing, absolutely nothing, puts the truth that appears into suspicion, well in any case we must suspect it because the mission of the journalist with controcazzi is that, hasta la verdad siemprea nice gynecological examination to verify that the rape is not the bubba of a siroccata in search of the quarter of an hour of fame.

Let's talk about "If the denial of the massacres is passed off as professional scruple" with our community!
Start a new Thread

Philip Owell

Professional blogger, here to bring you new and interesting content every time you visit our blog.