We put the Honor 200 Pro through our rigorous suite of SBMARK Camera tests to measure its performance in terms of photo, video, and zoom quality from an end-user perspective. This article takes a closer look at how the device fared across a range of tests and common use cases, and aims to highlight the key findings from our tests with an excerpt of the data we captured.
Overview
Camera Key Specifications:
- Primary: 50 MP, f/1.9 aperture lens, OIS, measured effective focal length of 27 mm
- Ultra-Wide: 12 MP, f/2.2 aperture lens, measured effective focal length of 16 mm
- Telephoto: 50MP, f/2.4 aperture, OIS
Pros
- Fast and accurate autofocus in all tested conditions
- Generally accurate target exposure under most tested conditions, with a dynamic range wide enough for photography
- Fairly neutral white balance in outdoor photography
- Texture-noise compromise well handled in outdoor conditions
- Well-preserved details on long-distance shots
Against
- Slightly low contrast in high dynamic scenes in the photo
- Occasional color casts in photos and slight oversaturation in videos, particularly on reds and oranges and skin tones
- Typically a compromise between texture and low noise in low-light and indoor conditions, with some chroma noise.
- Occasional artifacts such as flare, halos and color quantization
The Honor 200 Pro is a versatile and capable smartphone, with a triple-camera setup that brings with it a wealth of imaging options. Honor calls the 200 Pro’s 50MP main camera with an f/1.9 aperture a “studio-level portrait camera.”
Marketed as “the master of portraiture”, the device has the makings of good portraits, thanks to its reliable autofocus, accurate target exposure and fairly wide dynamic range, although some color instabilities were noted.
For colors, some occasional color casts and skin tone inaccuracies were visible at times. Images also contained some color noise, particularly in low-light conditions. Strong backlighting conditions could also cause low contrast in images.
The Honor 200 Pro’s excellent performance in terms of autofocus, exposure and well-controlled noise in videos was offset by inconsistencies in stabilization, which were evident when shooting action videos while walking.
Test summary
About SBMARK Camera Tests: SBMARK camera ratings are conducted in laboratories and in real-world situations using a wide variety of subjects. Scores are based on objective tests where results are calculated directly by measurement software on our laboratory setups, and perceptual tests where a sophisticated set of parameters allows a panel of image experts to compare aspects of image quality that require human judgment. A smartphone test involves a team of engineers and technicians for approximately one week. Photo, zoom and video quality are evaluated separately and then combined into an overall score for comparing cameras across multiple devices. For more information on the SBMARK Camera protocol, click here. More details on smartphone camera scores can be found here. The following section summarizes key elements of SBMARK’s comprehensive testing and analysis. Full performance ratings are available upon request. Contact us to learn how to receive a full report.
Honor 200 Pro Camera Scores
This chart compares SBMARK scores for photo, zoom and video between the tested device and the references. The average and maximum scores for the price segment are also shown. The average and maximum scores for each price segment are calculated based on the SBMARK database of tested devices.
Photo
138
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
About SBMARK Camera Photo Tests
For evaluation and analysis, SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2,600 test images in both controlled laboratory environments and natural outdoor, indoor and low-light scenes, using default camera settings. The photographic protocol is designed to account for key use cases and is based on typical shooting scenarios, such as portrait, family and landscape photography. Evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and performing objective measurements on chart images captured in the laboratory under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1,000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.
The Honor 200 Pro’s autofocus was very good thanks to an efficient integration of zero shutter lag technology. This kept the subject in focus even in low-light conditions. Facial details were quite high with a well-controlled noise level, especially when shooting outdoors. The wide dynamic range maintained a good level of detail on faces and backgrounds even in difficult lighting conditions such as backlit shots.
However, colors were not always accurate in outdoor conditions, particularly in skies, and sometimes in low-light conditions. Difficult backlit scenes would produce images with slightly low contrast and lens flare. Color noise could be visible, particularly in low-light conditions, along with some local loss of detail.
Honor 200 Pro Photo Scores
Photographic tests analyze image quality attributes such as exposure, color, texture, and noise under various lighting conditions. Autofocus performance and artifacts are also evaluated on all images captured under controlled laboratory conditions and in real-world images. All of these attributes have a significant impact on the final quality of images captured with the tested device and can help to understand the main strengths and weaknesses of the camera.
Exposure
111
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Color
106
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Exposure and color are the key attributes for technically good images. For exposure, the primary attribute evaluated is the brightness of the main subject across various use cases such as landscape, portrait, or still life. Other factors evaluated are contrast and dynamic range, such as the ability to render details in both the bright and dark areas of the image. Repeatability is also important because it demonstrates the camera’s ability to provide the same rendering when taking multiple images of the same scene.
For color, the image quality attributes analyzed are skin tone rendition, white balance, color hue, and repeatability. For color and skin tone rendition, we penalize unnatural colors but respect the manufacturer’s choice of color signature.


Samsung Galaxy S23 FE – Skin tones slightly inaccurate, low contrast

Xiaomi 13T Pro: Slightly inaccurate skin tones, rather wide dynamic range, low target exposure and cropped dark parts on the foreground model, low contrast on the background model
Auto focus
113
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Autofocus tests focus on focus accuracy, focus repeatability, shutter lag, and depth of field. Shutter lag is the difference between when the user presses the capture button and when the image is actually taken. It includes the speed of focusing and the ability of the device to capture images at the right time, what is called “zero shutter lag” capability. While a shallow depth of field can be nice for a single subject portrait or a close-up shot, it can also be a problem in some specific conditions such as group portraits; both are tested. Focus accuracy is also evaluated in all real-world images taken, from infinity to close-up objects and in low-light and outdoor conditions.
Edge sharpness irregularity and average trigger delay in all tested conditions
Autofocus speed and irregularity: 100Lux Δ7EV TL84 Handheld
Structure
105
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of subjects in images shot in the lab and in real-life scenarios. For natural shots, special attention is paid to the level of detail in the bright and dark areas of the image. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken under various lighting conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The charts used are the proprietary SBMARK (DMC) chart and the Dead Leaves chart.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) Detail Retention Score vs. Lux Levels for Tripod and Handheld Conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Retention Score with lux level, for two holding conditions. The DMC Detail Retention Score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate texture and detail rendering on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.
Noise
96
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure on real images and chart images taken in the laboratory. For natural images, special attention is paid to noise on faces, landscapes, but also on dark areas and high dynamic range conditions. Noise on moving objects is also evaluated on natural images. Objective measurements are performed on chart images taken in various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux and different types of dynamic range conditions. The chart used is the Dead Leaves chart and the measurement standardized as Visual Noise derived from ISO 15739.
Evolution of visual noise with illuminance levels in portable conditions
This graph shows the evolution of the visual noise metric with lux level in handheld conditions. The visual noise metric is the average of the visual noise measurement across all Dead Leaves plot patches in the AFHDR configuration. The SBMARK visual noise measurement is derived from the ISO15739 standard.
Artifacts
71
Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G
Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G
Artifact grading examines lens shading, chromatic aberrations, geometric distortion, edge ringing, halos, ghosting, quantization, unexpected color shifts, among other types of possible unnatural effects on photos. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the higher the points deducted from the score. The main artifacts observed and the corresponding loss of points are listed below.
Penalty for main photo artifacts
Blurry
70
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Bokeh is tested in a dedicated mode, usually portrait mode or aperture, and analyzed by visually inspecting all images captured in the lab and in natural conditions. The goal is to reproduce a portrait photograph comparable to that taken with a DLSR and a wide aperture. The main image quality attributes that are paid attention to are depth estimation, artifacts, blur gradient, and the shape of the bokeh blur reflectors. Portrait image quality attributes (exposure, color, texture) are also taken into account.

Depth estimation is accurate and subject isolation is efficient.
For portraits, we tested the device in aperture mode using the vibrant color option, which is its default setting. In our test, the Honor 200 Pro isolated the subject efficiently and showed accurate depth estimation.
Preview
69
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Preview tests analyze the image quality of the camera app’s image preview, with a focus on the difference between capture and preview, particularly with respect to dynamic range and the application of bokeh. The smoothness of exposure, color, and focus adaptation when zooming from the minimum to the maximum zoom factor available is also evaluated. Preview frame rate is measured using the LED Universal Timer.

Honor 200 Pro – preview: dynamic range is limited

Honor 200 Pro – capture: the dynamic range is wider
Enlarge
132
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
About SBMARK Camera Zoom Tests
SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 400 test images in controlled laboratory environments and in natural outdoor, indoor and low-light scenes, using camera presets and pinch zoom at various zoom factors from ultra-wide to ultra-long range zoom. Evaluation is performed by visually inspecting images Cons a natural scene reference and by performing objective measurements of lab-captured chart images under various conditions from 20 to 1000 lux and color temperatures from 2300K to 6500K.
The Honor 200 Pro’s zoom capabilities were pretty good. The ultra-wide lens’s minimum focal length was 15.8mm, offering a 112-degree field of view, which is slightly less than some of its competitors. Images contained a good level of detail, despite the slightly limited field of view.
With a 2.5x optical zoom, the level of image detail remained quite high up to 70mm. In addition, the image quality of the telephoto zoom slightly decreased with the digital zoom, although the level of detail was acceptable even at long distances.
In the tested video mode (4K at 60 fps), the ultrawide camera is not available, which affects the user experience of video zoom. However, in the telephoto mode of video zoom, details were generally well preserved.
Honor 200 Pro Zoom Scores
This graph illustrates the relative scores for the different zoom ranges evaluated. The x-axis is expressed in 35mm equivalent focal length. Zoom in scores are displayed on the right and zoom out scores on the left.
Wide
90
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
Huawei PURA 70 ULTRA
These tests analyze the performance of the ultra-wide-angle camera at different focal lengths from 12mm to 20mm. All image quality attributes are evaluated, with particular attention to artifacts such as chromatic aberrations, lens softness, and distortion. The images below are an excerpt of tested scenes.

Honor 200 Pro – limited field of view, good details

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE – Wider field of view, slight loss of detail

Xiaomi 13T Pro – slightly wider field of view, loss of detail
TV
104
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Xiaomi 14 Ultra
All image quality attributes are evaluated at focal lengths from approximately 40mm to 300mm, with particular attention to texture and detail. The score is derived from a series of objective laboratory measurements and perceptual analysis of real images.
SBMARK (DMC) Detail Retention Score by Focal Length
SBMARK (DMC) Detail Retention Score by Focal Length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum score of the detail preservation metric: a higher value indicates better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.
SBMARK (DMC) Detail Retention Score by Focal Length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum score of the detail preservation metric: a higher value indicates better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.
SBMARK (DMC) Detail Retention Score by Focal Length
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC detail preservation score versus the full-frame equivalent focal length for different lighting conditions. The x-axis represents the equivalent focal length measured for each corresponding shooting distance and the y-axis represents the maximum score of the detail preservation metric: a higher value indicates better quality. The large dots correspond to the zoom ratio available in the camera application UI.
video
134
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
About SBMARK Camera Video Tests
SBMARK engineers capture and evaluate more than 2.5 hours of video in controlled laboratory environments and natural low-light scenes, indoors and outdoors, using the camera’s default settings. The evaluation consists of visually inspecting natural video captured under various conditions and performing objective measurements on lab-recorded chart videos under various conditions from 1 to 1000+ lux and color temperatures from 2,300K to 6,500K.
In the video, we tested the Honor 200 Pro in 4K at 60 fps. Video exposure was good, but color was sometimes inaccurate in indoor or low-light conditions.
Autofocus was accurate and smooth. While noise was generally well handled, detail levels were a little low, despite being in 4K.
Compared to its competitors, the Honor 200 Pro lacked video stabilization, resulting in frame shifts and residual motion.
Honor 200 Pro Video Scores
Exposure
100
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Color
96
Honor Magic6 Pro
Honor Magic6 Pro
Exposure tests evaluate the brightness of the main subject and the dynamic range, i.e. the ability to make details visible in both the bright and dark areas of the image. Exposure stability and temporal adaptation are also analyzed.
Image quality color analysis examines color rendition, skin tone rendition, white balance, color hue, white balance stability and its adaptation to changing light.
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE – dark cutout, no color cast, natural skin tones
Xiaomi 13T Pro: No dark clipping, slight orange tint, natural skin tones.
Structure
94
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Oppo Find X6 Pro
Texture tests analyze the level of detail and texture of real videos and laboratory-recorded graphic videos. Natural video recordings are evaluated visually, with particular attention to the level of detail in bright and dark areas. Objective measurements are performed on graphic images taken under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The graphs used are the SBMARK (DMC) graph and the Dead Leaves graph.
SBMARK CHART (DMC) Video Detail Retention Score vs. Lux Levels
This graph shows the evolution of the DMC Detail Preservation video score with the level of lux in the video. The DMC Detail Preservation score is derived from an AI-based metric trained to evaluate the rendering of texture and detail on a selection of crops from our SBMARK chart.
Noise
116
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Noise tests analyze various noise attributes such as intensity, chromaticity, grain, structure, temporal aspects on real video recordings and lab-shot chart videos. Natural videos are evaluated visually, with special attention to noise in dark areas and under high dynamic range conditions. Objective measurements are performed on chart videos recorded under various conditions from 1 to 1000 lux. The chart used is the SBMARK Visual Noise Chart.
Evolution of spatial visual noise with the illuminance level
Temporal evolution of visual noise with the level of illumination
This graph shows the evolution of temporal visual noise with lux level. Temporal visual noise is measured on the visual noise graph in the video noise configuration.
Stabilization
105
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Apple iPhone 15 Pro
Stabilization rating tests the device’s ability to stabilize footage using software or hardware technologies such as OIS, EIS, or any other means. The rating looks at residual motion, smoothness, yellow artifacts, and residual motion blur in walking and running usage cases under various lighting conditions. The video below is an excerpt from one of the scenes tested.
Honor 200 Pro: Frames and residual motion are visible
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: Efficient stabilization, slight residual movement
Artifacts
81
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Artifacts are evaluated with MTF and ringing measurements on the SFR chart in the lab, as well as frame rate measurements using the LED Universal Timer. Natural videos are evaluated visually with special attention to artifacts such as aliasing, quantization, blocking, and hue shift, among others. The more severe and frequent the artifact, the higher the points deducted from the score. The main artifacts and the corresponding point loss are listed below.
Penalty for major video artifacts

Start a new Thread