We put the Samsung Galaxy A56 through our rigorous DXOMark display test suite to measure its performance on four criteria. In these test results, we will break down the way it went to a variety of tests and several cases of common use.
Score
Under scores and attributes included in the calculations of the global score.
Samsung Galaxy A56
150
display
Label and attributes of comfort for the eyes
Probability of perception of flicker
% of the population
1.57
Minimum brightness
in Nits
0.56
Circadian action factor
100%
Color
Consistency
VS Space color display-p3
Pros
- Pleasant video experience, with brightness that is suitable for HDR10 videos
- Ability above the average in internal and external conditions
- Good color rendering in most lighting environments for viewing photos
Against
- Bad management of unwanted touches
- The automatic brightness in dark environments is too high
- Green pink fringes if seen at the corner
The Samsung Galaxy A56 display offers an impressive overall performance, which stands out in several key areas.
Its readability is well optimized for internal conditions and offers significantly higher brightness outdoors than its competitors, guaranteeing a more comfortable vision and better readability. However, in dark environments, automatic brightness levels remain excessively high, which can push users to manually adjust the brightness.
The color rendering is accurate in various lighting conditions, making the display particularly suitable for viewing photos. However, pink and green fringes may appear if displayed at the corner, influencing the overall perception of quality.
The 90Hz smooth update frequency improves the fluidity of the sliding, guaranteeing a user experience without continuity of both in the interface and in web browsing.
However, struggle with non -intentional touches, which can occasionally affect usability.
The device has particularly distinguished itself in video playback. The brightness levels are well calibrated for the contents of HDR10 with adapted contrasts.
In addition, the Samsung Galaxy A56 benefits from a minimum flicker, low minimum luminance, accuracy of the constant color and effective filtering of blue light, also overlapping the S25 series. These performances make the device suitable for the Comfort label for DXOMark’s eyes, recognizing it as a device that provides a comfortable and effortless vision for extended use.
Test summary
DXOMark display test information: For the score and analysis, a device undergoes a series of objective and perceptive tests in controlled laboratory conditions and real life. The Dxomark Display score takes into account the overall user experience provided by the screen, considering the hardware capacity and the software developed. In the tests, only video apps and photos installed in the factory are used. More in -depth details on how Dxomark tests are available in the article “A more attentive look at DXOMark display tests”.
The following section focuses on the key elements of our tests and exhaustive analysis performed in the DXOMark workshops. Complete relationships with detailed performance assessments are available on request. To order a copy, contact us.
As is composed as the readability score of the display
Readability evaluates the ease and comfort of the user to view content, such as photos or a web page, on the display under different lighting conditions. Our measurements performed in the workshops are completed through perceptual tests and analysis.
Rendering of the skin tone in an internal environment (1000 lux)
From left to right: Samsung Galaxy A56, Honor 200, Motorola Edge 50 Neo
(Photo only for illustration)
Skin rendering in a sunlight (> 90,000 lux)
From left to right: Samsung Galaxy A56, Honor 200, Motorola Edge 50 Neo
(Photo only for illustration)
Ski stands for the mirror component included, which measures both the widespread reflection and mirror reflection. The reflection of a simple glass sheet is about 4%, while reaching about 6% for a plastic sheet. Although the first surface of the smartphones is made of glass, their total reflection (without coating) is usually about 5% due to more reflections created by the optical stack complex.
The average reflectance is calculated on the basis of the spectral reflectance in the visible spectrum interval (see graphic graphic) and the human spectral sensitivity.
Uniformity
This graph shows the distribution of the luminance during the entire display panel. The uniformity is measured with a 20%gray motif, with brilliant green that indicates ideal luminance. A bright green color evenly scattered on the screen indicates that the brightness of the display is uniform. Other colors indicate a loss of uniformity.
Modulation of the width of the impulse is a modulation technique that generates variable width impulses to represent the breadth of an analog input signal. This measurement is important for comfort because low frequencies can be perceived by some individuals and, in the most extreme cases, can induce convulsions. Some experiments show that the discomfort may appear at a higher frequency. A high PWM frequency (> 1500 Hz) tends to be less disturbing for users.
How the display of the display color is composed
Color assessments are performed in different lighting conditions to see how well the device well manages the color with the surrounding environment. The devices are tested with SRGB image schemes and display-p3. Both faithful mode and default mode are used for our evaluation. Our measurements performed in the workshops are completed through perceptual tests and analysis.
The circadian action factor is a metric that defines how light affects the cycle of human sleep. It is the relationship between the energy of light that contributes to sleep disorders (centered around 450 Nm, which represents blue light) on the energy of light which contributes to our perception (which covers from 400 Nm to 700 Nm and centered on 550 Nm, which is green light). A high circadian action factor means that environmental light contains strong blue light energy and it is likely that it influences the body’s sleep cycle, while a low circadian action factor implies that light has a weak blue light energy and it is less likely to influence sleep models.
How it is composed how to view the video score
The video attribute evaluates the video handling of the standard dynamic range (DSD) and the dynamic range (HDR10) in internal and poor lighting conditions. Our measurements performed in the workshops are completed through perceptual tests and analysis.
Video rendering in an environment in low light conditions (0 lux)
Clockwise from the top left: Samsung Galaxy A56, Honor 200, Motorola Edge 50 Neo
(Photo only for illustration)
These calibers have the percentage of irregularities of the frame in a 30 second video. These irregularities are not necessarily perceived by users (unless they are all in the same TimesTamp) but are a performance indicator.
How the display of the display touch is composed
We evaluate the touch attributes in many types of content in which the touch is the key and requires different behaviors such as the game (quick touch to the response time), web (regular scrolling of the page) and images (accurate navigation and regular from one image to another).
Start a new Thread